Strict Scrutiny vs Rational Basis Review
The three tiers of judicial review—rational basis, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny—are among the most tested concepts in constitutional law. Mastering which standard applies and how courts evaluate laws under each test is essential for 1L courses, the MBE bar exam, and any Equal Protection or Due Process analysis.
Interactive Deck
5 CardsWhat triggers intermediate scrutiny?
Rational basis vs strict scrutiny burden
Master this topic effortlessly.
Study G helps you master any topic effortlessly using proven learning algorithms and smart review timing
Download Study GFrequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between strict scrutiny and rational basis review?
Strict scrutiny requires a compelling interest and narrow tailoring—government almost always loses. Rational basis only requires a legitimate interest and rational relation—government almost always wins.
- Strict scrutiny: suspect classes, fundamental rights
- Rational basis: economic/social laws, most other classifications
What are the three levels of judicial review in constitutional law?
The three tiers are rational basis (lowest), intermediate scrutiny (middle), and strict scrutiny (highest). The level depends on the classification or right at stake, ranging from deferential review to near-automatic invalidation.
How do I remember which scrutiny level applies?
Use these triggers: race or national origin → strict scrutiny; sex or legitimacy → intermediate scrutiny; everything else → rational basis. For rights: fundamental rights (voting, travel, privacy) → strict scrutiny; non-fundamental → rational basis.
